The court observed that the girl is free to
live with the youth or marry him later when he attains the marriageable age.
The Kerala high court allowed an 18-year-old boy and 19-year-old
girl to live together, saying it cannot close its eyes to the fact that such
relationships have become rampant in society.
A division bench of justices
V Chitambaresh and KP Jyothindranath pronounced the judgment while dismissing a habeas corpus petition filed by the girl’s father. The Supreme Court had recently held that an adult couple has a right to live together without marriage, while asserting that a 20-year-old Kerala woman, whose marriage had been annulled, could choose whom she wanted to live with.
V Chitambaresh and KP Jyothindranath pronounced the judgment while dismissing a habeas corpus petition filed by the girl’s father. The Supreme Court had recently held that an adult couple has a right to live together without marriage, while asserting that a 20-year-old Kerala woman, whose marriage had been annulled, could choose whom she wanted to live with.
The father of the girl moved
the high court alleging that his daughter was illegally detained by the boy.
Both the girl and the boy are Muslims and hail from Alappuzha district.
The father also mentioned
that marriageable age of man is 21 and woman is 18 in the country. But the
court cited the recent verdict of the apex court that held adults have rights
to be in a live-in relationship even if they have not attained the legal age of
marriage. “The court is bound to respect the unfettered right of a major to
have a live-in relationship even though it may not be palatable to the orthodox
section of the society,” it said while rejecting the father’s petition.
The court held that the girl
is free to live with the boy or marry him later when he attains the
marriageable age. It also noted that both are in a live-in relationship and are
practically living as husband and wife, though not legally wedded.
“It transpires that the girl
is living with the boy out of her own volition and she being a major has a
right to live whatever she wants to as is permissible,” the court observed in
its verdict.
Comments
Post a Comment